Noise is an extremely old problem. The earliest recorded noise complaint is 4,000 years old. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, one of the gods was so irritated by the racket caused by humans that he exterminated them. There are examples of people killing each other in part because they were fed up with noise. Noise has even been used as a weapon by the US military; heavy metal was blasted at dictator Manuel Noriega’s hideout to force him to surrender, explains The Atlantic contributing writer Bianca Bosker on this episode of Today, Explained. (It worked.)
Noise has health implications, too. As Vox senior health correspondent Julia Belluz previously reported, noise pollution has become a major, underappreciated threat to hearing. Everything from the music in spinning classes to the chatter in restaurants can take a toll on our bodies.
To learn more about how noise impacts our everyday lives, here’s a lightly edited transcript of Bianca Bosker’s conversation on Today, Explained.
Subscribe to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including: Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, and ART19.
Noam Hassenfeld
Is there a technical definition of noise? What’s the best way to think about it?
Bianca Bosker
There are various definitions of noise, but noise is slightly different from sound noise. Already that word implies sound with a judgment, right? Sound that is annoying, sound that is disturbing. And part of what makes noise such a difficult thing to fight is that it is subjective. I spoke with an acoustic expert who described it to me as, “Sound is when you mow your lawn, noise is when your neighbor mows their lawn, and music is when your neighbor mows your lawn.”
What’s tricky about noise as a kind of foe is that it doesn’t leave a trace. It vanishes when you go after it. It’s hard to measure. It’s hard to describe. And again, it’s subjective. You know, your music literally sometimes, right ... if you’re living in an apartment with your neighbors, blasting music is oftentimes my noise.
One thing to also keep in mind is that noise isn’t necessarily loud. I think a lot of us had this idea that sound has to be at a really high volume to drive us crazy. And if you ever tried to sleep through, like, a dripping faucet, you know that something can be very quiet and still drive you up the wall.
Noam Hassenfeld
So [noise] can be annoying for people. But is it actually bad? Is it bad for health?
Bianca Bosker
There [are] certain short-term effects of noise. In response to noise, we release stress hormones, our blood pressure goes up, our heart rate rises, and our body can respond to noise, especially at night, as low as around 33 decibels, which is around as loud as a purring cat.
Studies have shown that over long periods of time, prolonged exposure to noise can lead to a higher risk of high blood pressure, coronary heart disease, heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, dementia, depression. It can be very harmful to children. There was a landmark study that was done in the ‘70s, there were two classrooms in a school in New York, one of which was very close to the clatter of a subway track. And they found that the reading level of that noisy classroom was actually around a year behind that of students in a quieter classroom. And that difference disappeared once they installed some noise abatement to reduce the sound.
Noam Hassenfeld
Is it mostly affecting people that live in cities? Is it affecting certain types of populations differently?
Bianca Bosker
Noise levels tend to be higher in poorer communities, as well as neighborhoods that have higher populations of black, Asian, and Latino residents. In fact, these researchers thought that their numbers might actually underestimate the difference, because people who are wealthier probably take soundproofing measures to even further protect themselves from any noise that may exist.
Noam Hassenfeld
Like you’re paying a premium for silence when you pay more for housing, or something.
Bianca Bosker
Or even quiet. That quiet is something that’s only accessible to people who work on lush corporate campuses, or have the money to go to stores, or a silent yoga retreat, or you name it to escape.
Again, we often think about noise as being this kind of 1 percent problem, something that people, you know, they complain about the leaf blowers at their vacation homes. But in fact, noise can have an undue burden on people that don’t have the resources to protect themselves from it. There really is a concern that silence and quiet is becoming a luxury.
Noam Hassenfeld
I imagine there are different laws in different places about this. Is there, like, a national law against noise in any way?
Bianca Bosker
The federal government briefly had an appetite for noise legislation in the ‘70s. In 1972, the Nixon administration passed a federal noise statute designed to quiet the country. But in 1981, just nine years later, the Reagan administration withdrew funding for that. And so since then, as one of these noise experts put it, the federal government has essentially been out of the noise business, and the burden has fallen to local governments to really take charge on quieting their constituents.
Noam Hassenfeld
So if the burden is falling to local communities, what kind of regulations do they have? How do you stop things like this?
Bianca Bosker
In general, local noise codes tend to be either qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative basically prohibits any sort of noise that is disturbing or unreasonably loud, but they don’t go so far as to define what constitutes disturbing or unreasonably loud.
A quantitative noise code, on the other hand, will define in quantitative, measurable terms what is disturbing or unreasonably loud. So New York City, for example, has a quantitative noise code.
There are rules that say that a dog can’t bark for more than 10 continuous minutes between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. I believe that’s what it says. But between like 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., I believe a dog can only bark for five continuous minutes.
Noam Hassenfeld
Wait, seriously? That’s, that’s a real thing?
Bianca Bosker
If a dog is barking for three continuous minutes at 2 in the morning, I think technically it’s okay. But there are noise researchers who argue that even with these measurements, we may not be measuring noise correctly. Noise codes tend to not put as much weight on, let’s say, very low frequency noise that can: a) travel very far distances, and b) can be felt. I mean, low-frequency noise, that’s things like the rattle from a subwoofer or the thudding of a bus outside ... things that you may feel more than you can actually hear them.
Noam Hassenfeld
Okay, so just to be clear, it’s really noisy out there and the regulations we do have aren’t exactly doing much. Do we just have to get used to a noisy world?
Bianca Bosker
It’s important to appreciate the way that the nature of noise is changing. It used to be that a lot of the noise was created by the human hand. We were ringing bells, we were driving carriages, we were crying as town criers. And now, when you look at the noise, it’s being produced. One thing that’s kind of chilling is the way that it’s become autonomous. Machines are an inexhaustible source of noise. Their vocal cords don’t tire. They don’t need to take a break. They can just keep going and they can be amplified.
Because we have become so surrounded by noise, a lot of us have responded by adding our own noise to it. We insulate ourselves from outside noise by giving ourselves personal noise. We listen to podcasts. We listen to music. And so, in some ways, that may not be helping the problem. I mean, I do want people to listen to the end of this podcast.
But you know, I also think that in some ways we’ve reacted defensively to noise by adding more noise. It raises the question of, if we took out our earphones, if we had to listen to the sound of our cities, of our environments, what do we hear? Do you like it? Are we bothered by it? And if we are bothered by it, let’s do something about it.