中文导读
最低工资标准被视为一项“兜底”指标，指劳动者正常劳动情况下，用人单位必须依法支付的报酬，许多国家视最低工资标准的调整为促进社会财富再分配的一种重要途径。然而最新研究表明，最低工资标准的上调将对一些中小企业造成经营上的负担，向这些企业发放补贴或制定区别化政策或成为缓解工资上调压力的有效手段。
A new paper suggests that higher minimum wages hit poorer bosses’ pockets
A minimum wage is supposed to redistribute money from rich to poor. But economists disagree about whether it actually does so. Some researchers, for example, have found that, in America, Canada and Europe, raising the minimum wage tends to decrease employment among the least-skilled workers, as firms downsize to trim costs. Others have found no effect on employment. And although no one doubts that the policy raises wages for the workers who stay employed, still unsettled is the question of where that extra money comes from.
A new paper by Lev Drucker and Katya Mazirov of Israel’s Ministry of Finance, and David Neumark of the University of California, Irvine, examines increases in Israel’s minimum wage in 2006-08 in search of an answer. The more low-wage workers a company employed, they found, the more its profits declined. Companies with 60-80% of staff earning the minimum wage saw their profits cut by almost half.
The researchers’ central insight is that firms with relatively low profits disproportionately employed minimum-wage workers, meaning those firms ultimately bore the greatest burden of mandated higher wages. Poorer business owners suffered bigger losses. Those on median incomes (for the population at large) took a profit hit 8% larger than those at the 75th percentile.
Since business owners with low earnings relative to their peers are still relatively well off compared with the general population, raising the minimum wage is still progressive. But it may seem unfair, as low-income businesspeople pay, but richer business owners and better-off employees do not. Those lower-income bosses who were hardest hit by minimum-wage increases earned only about as much as many mid- to high-earning workers. And a higher minimum wage is less progressive than raising taxes, which fall most heavily on the best-off, in order to fund tax credits for the poor. America’s earned-income tax credit works along these lines.
In some places, minimum-wage rules are designed to try to minimise the impact on low-earning firms. In America they apply only to businesses with sales exceeding a certain threshold. In South Korea, a minimum-wage increase in 2018 was accompanied by subsidies for small firms. The authors do not discuss how Israel’s lack of such provisions might affect their findings. But they do suggest using an employer tax credit to offset the disproportionate burden of minimum wages on low-income firms. Policymakers aiming to fight poverty and increase equity with minimum wages would do well to consider unintended effects.
——
Jan 9th 2020 | Finance&Economics | 439 words
☞点击“阅读原文”获取本周PDF(提取码tst5)
版权声明：
本文全文摘选自The Economist(4th Jan 2020)，仅供个人学习交流使用。欢迎转发至朋友圈。
@新英文杂志团队
新英文杂志
让阅读成为习惯
扫码关注我们
喜欢今天的内容吗？喜欢就点个“在看”吧⇣⇣