中文导读

2019年12月15日,历经14天拉锯,《联合国气候变化框架公约》第25次缔约方会议(COP25)终于在马德里落下了帷幕。尽管196个缔约国承诺将在2020年减少二氧化碳排放量,但各国围绕碳市场机制的分歧却依然存在。本次气候峰会与预期相去甚远,令人大失所望。解决气候危机迫在眉睫,世界又将何去何从?

Yet another meeting on the climate. Yet another disappointment

Annual UN climate summits are never moments of unbridled optimism, but this year’s, held in Madrid and dubbed COP25, was particularly dispiriting. Its logo was a clock with its hands at a quarter to 12. Midnight duly passed on Friday December 13th—supposedly the summit’s last day, and then again on Saturday. Only on Sunday did delegates agree to weak and watered-down commitments to enact previously promised cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases. And they deferred until next year a decision on regulating a new international carbon market.

In 2015, in Paris, nearly 200 countries promised to stop global warming before average temperatures rose by more than 1.5-2°C above pre-industrial levels. Most climate scientists, though, admit privately that there is little hope of this. A coalition of governments including the European Union therefore came to Madrid demanding a strongly worded final text that would urge all countries to promise in 2020 to cut emissions further and faster than agreed so far. That text failed to materialise.

In fact, the real effort on this front came from Brussels, where the EU’s leaders, after some wrangling, committed themselves on December 12th to reducing emissions to “net zero” by 2050. This means any release of greenhouse gases thereafter will be balanced by the capture of such gases already in the atmosphere by, say, extra afforestation. The European Commission’s presidency has published a comprehensive and ambitious, if sometimes vague, proposal for measures that would achieve this goal. As part of it, an EU climate law enshrining the 2050 target will be put forward in the spring of 2020.

Weak and watered-down commitments to enact cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases are nothing new. What COP25 is really likely to be remembered for, though, is a failure to deal with carbon markets. Plans for such markets go back to a scheme created by the Kyoto protocol, a treaty signed in 1992. An arcane technical clause in the Paris agreement then offered a framework for linking existing national or regional markets and thus creating a new global one that would be administered by the UN and offer access to countries that do not have their own. Delegates in Madrid drew up guidelines for environmentally sound trading principles for this putative market. What they did not make clear was how all this would connect with what Kyoto had already achieved.

Credit where it’s due

The Kyoto version of carbon markets, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), let rich countries buy carbon credits from poor countries for carbon-capturing projects that offset their emissions at home. Thousands of CDM projects were duly registered, but unknown numbers of credits were left unclaimed after their value crashed in 2012, because demand dried up as a result of rule changes within the EU.

Some of the main participants in the CDM, chiefly Brazil, want these credits transferred to the Paris scheme. But doing so would flood that scheme with “hot air”: credits that no longer correspond to real, future reductions in emissions.

Done well, international carbon markets could accelerate emissions cuts by drawing in private funds and helping money to flow faster to the cheapest opportunities. One analysis, by the Environmental Defence Fund, an advocacy group, found that they might, in theory, reduce the cost of meeting climate targets by between 59% and 79%, assuming most countries participated. If financial gains were reinvested in further climate action, cumulative emissions cuts between 2020 and 2035 might be double those currently on the table in national pledges under the Paris agreement.

All this leaves a lot to do in 2020. Within the UN, technical work on carbon markets will resume in the new year, leading up to next year’s meeting, in Glasgow. Climate is also on the agenda at an EU-China summit scheduled for September. During his presidency, Barack Obama was able to work with China’s president, Xi Jinping, and break the stalemate that had previously existed between the world’s two largest emitters. With America set to pull out of the Paris agreement in November, perhaps the European Union can step into the gap.

——

Dec 18th 2019 | Science and technology | 679 words

☞点击“阅读原文”获取本周PDF(提取码63rc)

☞点击下方“小打卡”查看全文重难点注解

点击图片阅读热门文章

Diabetes: Sugar high

糖尿病:甜蜜一击

Menopause: Second spring

更年期:第二春

Free exchange: Mighty market power dangers

自由交流:强大市场势力的危险

版权声明:

本文全文摘选自The Economist(Dec 21st 2019 edition),仅供个人学习交流使用。欢迎转发至朋友圈。

@新英文杂志团队

新英文杂志

让阅读成为习惯

扫码关注我们

喜欢今天的内容吗?喜欢就点个“在看”吧⇣⇣